Monday, 9 August 2010

We're not writers we're dictating monkeys!

I'm feeling in a feisty mood today. I'm ready to pick a fight with anyone that does not smell like coffee. However, I will take a deep breath and pick on the publishing industry instead.

Is it just me or do many of the books on the shelves today read alike? Formulaic Fiction! I blame the publishers. They want a specific standard (hell, they come out with a book  - The Chicago Manual of Style - only a mile thick and updated every year) and so many authors are forced to conform to a mold and somehow the voice gets squashed in the process.

As writers we're told: Write simply. Use small words. Use small sentences. Keep your paragraphs short. Writer's keep your comments to yourself. Does everyone's voice sound like that?

What happened to art? 

Finnegan's Wake by James Joyce, The Sound and the Fury by Faulkner, Moby Dick by Herman Melville are being studied for their literary value and complexities in universities around the world. What books are going to come from our generation or from generations to come that challenge us, challenge our minds?

What happened to books like these?
After a short struggle, however, Charles Hayter seemed to quit the field.
Three days had passed without his coming once to Uppercross;
a most decided change.  He had even refused one regular invitation to dinner;
and having been found on the occasion by Mr Musgrove with some large books
before him, Mr and Mrs Musgrove were sure all could not be right,
and talked, with grave faces, of his studying himself to death.
It was Mary's hope and belief that he had received a positive dismissal
from Henrietta, and her husband lived under the constant dependence
of seeing him to-morrow.  Anne could only feel that Charles Hayter
was wise. - Persuasion by Jane Austen

Jane Austen switches POV multiple times in this paragraph and, as author, she interjects with her own commentary. She would probably be rejected by publishing companies and yet we love her.

So Sarah Bletchley said with her baby in her arms, tipping her foot up and down as though she were by her own fender in Pimlico, but keeping her eyes on the Mall, while Emily Coates ranged over the Palace windows and thought of the housemaids, the innumerable housemaids, the bedrooms, the innumerable bedrooms. Joined by an elderly gentleman with an Aberdeen terrier, by men without occupation, the crowd increased. Little Mr. Bowley, who had rooms in the Albany and was sealed with wax over the deeper sources of life but could be unsealed suddenly, inappropriately, sentimentally, by this sort of thing — poor women waiting to see the Queen go past — poor women, nice little children, orphans, widows, the War — tut-tut — actually had tears in his eyes. A breeze flaunting ever so warmly down the Mall through the thin trees, past the bronze heroes, lifted some flag flying in the British breast of Mr. Bowley and he raised his hat as the car turned into the Mall and held it high as the car approached; and let the poor mothers of Pimlico press close to him, and stood very upright. The car came on. - Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf
 This relatively unknown author - Virginia Woolf (just joking) - uses long and really long paragraphs, switches POV on a dime, and won't be understood without a big brain. If this manuscript was sent to the publishers of today, they'd have probably thrown it in the garbage. Yet, it's classic literature.
With a comfortable impression upon him, and quite an honest one in its way, that he was still patronising Little Dorrit in doing what had no reference to her, he found himself one afternoon at the corner of Mr Casby's street. Mr Casby lived in a street in the Gray's Inn Road, which had set off from that thoroughfare with the intention of running at one heat down into the valley, and up again to the top of Pentonville Hill; but which had run itself out of breath in twenty yards, and had stood still ever since. There is no such place in that part now; but it remained there for many years, looking with a baulked countenance at the wilderness patched with unfruitful gardens and pimpled with eruptive summerhouses, that it had meant to run over in no time. - Little Dorrit by Charles Dicken
CD used his books to preach to his readers - address problems of his day. In Little Dorrit he complained about the debtor's prison and The Circumlocution Office. He fills his books with far too many characters and plot lines. But how can we live without him?

Some day I'm going to take all the wisdom I've learned through the years and write a book THE WAY I WANT IT. It will never be published the conventional way, so I'll probably just make it available to people for free. I want it to have a powerful message and gosh darn it, if I want to preach my wisdom in it and yell at all the atrocities of life, I will! And if universities chose my book to study and try to decipher, I'd be honored.

That's all I have to say about that. Now, back to being a dictating monkey!Oh, and if you disagree with what I've said above, I want to hear from you. In fact, even if you agree with what I've said, I still want you to disagree. It's funner that way.

Picture Source: Addletters and here

32 comments:

Margot Kinberg said...

Clarissa - There really do seem to be a lot of formulaic novels out there now. One reason is definitely that publishers put a lot of pressure on authors to do things in a certain way. I think the reason for that is that, especially in this economy, publishers want books that they know will sell. A given formula has sold. Ergo, publishers want that formula. I see a strong parallel in movies, too. In order to see anything really unique, one almost has to confine oneself to indy studios.

Clarissa Draper said...

Margot, yes, that's exactly it. I'm not saying that I don't write the way the publishing industries tell me to, it's just that why!? Why do I have to? Money, money, money...

Googlover said...

I like you feisty! Formulas abound in our culture. I confess when an artist breaks out of their formula I am glad but still a bit miffed. Does that make sense? I want something different but I am more apt to like the same.

Clarissa Draper said...

Googlover, can I just say, I always want to type your name as Google Over, what is it suppose to mean? Also, you're right and that's why we continue to buy those books. Also, I think like would be irritating if all we had to read was James Joyce and Woolf.

CD

Amanda Sablan said...

I agree that there should be more originality in the fiction that's presented to us. I understand WHY there's not (publishers don't like taking risks if money is involved, and reasonably so) but I believe that a lot of readers would be willing to give something different at least a chance. That's why I write what I write, a combination of genres. Sure, that would make it harder for me to get published, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Clarissa Draper said...

Amanda, good for you. Readers are becoming so used to reading certain genres that it's difficult to even put something out there that doesn't fit the norm.

CD

Patricia Stoltey said...

Publishers are interested in what sells, I guess. And that means the ultimate blame must rest on those who actually purchase books or create demand at the library. We, the readers.

Even so, the really good fiction bubbles to the top because a few readers get the buzz going. One of my recent favorites was The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, which was a book of letters, a format I don't usually care for.

Patricia

J.L. Stratton said...

Another great post, Clarissa!

I'm starting to get to the point that I must check your site often just to make sure I'm not missing out on something good.

You Go Girl! And, keep it up.

Alex J. Cavanaugh said...

Not disagreeing with you, just tp provide a challenge!
Publishing is like the movie industry - scared to try anything new.

Clarissa Draper said...

Patricia, I haven't heard of that story, I want to check it out now.

JL, what a compliment! THank you. Glad you like the post.

Alex, yeah, it's sad. But, I mainly watch the classics now anyways.

CD

Corra McFeydon said...

Amen!!

This is why I'm claiming fiction for myself. I know it's not a viable solution for most writers, but I have to do it. The rules are too constricting for me.

I'll follow rules via non-fiction and see what happens. :-)

(Self-publish and get a thumbs up when I'm dead? Har!)

- C.

Mary said...

Great post.
Publishing pays big for that formula. Patterson and his stable for instance. Can't get more cookie cutter than that.
You're something else when you're on a roll, CD.

Robin said...

I agree and disagree. It depends on the market that you're trying to break into. In the US market I think it's all about money and what sells and once you get to BIG name publishers, they want what sells. Now, what I am finding in the Canadian market is quite different. We don't publish as much of the cookie cutter type books. Even the books coming out of Random House Canada or McLelland and Stewart are different. At least the ones I have seen lately.
At the same time, if you are not fortunate to have an agent and get your manuscript into those "big name" hands, then you are forced to submit to publishers that take unsolicited manuscripts, or even self-publish, and therefore your distribution is going to be on a smaller scale. Those publishers realize that more often than not, they are not going to make much (if any) money off of a novel, therefore relying on grants to keep their company going but at the same time, they publish more "literary" works that don't meet those formulaic guidelines. They take risk, suffer for it, but keep on going.
I don't know much about the US market or even any other international markets so I can only speak for what I am seeing locally.
I TOTALLY agree though, that the likes of Jane Austen and Virginia Woolf would have a practically impossible task of getting their work out there in this day and age. :)

Clarissa Draper said...

Corra, you understand. I will follow the rules for now regarding fiction but someday I want to write how I want to write.

Mary, thanks for that. I'm glad people understand what I'm saying. I hope no one is offended. No one seems to be.

CD

Jane Kennedy Sutton said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jane Kennedy Sutton said...

Oops. I made a boo boo, so I deleted my comment to try again. Sorry.

Great highway sign!

I was trying to think of a way to disagree with you, but I can’t do it. It seems the most important factor in the past was telling a good story. Now, it’s plenty of white space and whatever topic is hot – which obviously is still vampires. Sigh.

Clarissa Draper said...

Jane, yes, it is funny how things have changed. Vampires. Yes.

CD

rebecca said...

That's why I like the classics. I go to bookstores and see shelf after shelf of books that to me are elementary in comparison. You pick up a good classic or Pulitzer Prize English/American/Spanish/(insert your choice here) writer/playwright and you can see the difference. Once you've read these types of books you can't go back. You shouldn't go back. I say, write what your heart dictates and stuff the rest. There will be a public out there that will enjoy your words.....

Clarissa Draper said...

Robin, I forgot about the Canadian market and you're right about that. It's different there. I think I'll actually try to publish one of my books through the Canadian market in the future.

Rebecca, me too. I find it sometimes difficult to read some modern books because it's so simple.

CD

Modo B said...

Boy, did this post hit home with me. My (former) agent took a chance when she signed me for Motor Dolls. She knew it didn't fit a formula, but she wanted to give it a go anyway. The fourteen or so publishers she sent to said "They didn't know where it fit on the shelf," so therefore, would have to pass. During that time, I did several rewrites, and with each rewrite, it got farther from my intention. My goal now? To get it back to my original vision and take it out on my own. It's sad. But times are changing.

Thanks for this post...

elizabeth mueller said...

Amen, sister! Don't forget to mention Peter S Beagle's The Last Unicorn. It's full of purple prose, and personification!

I share the same pet peeve with you. I also feel that we, as writers, lose our individuality when it comes to writing.

As for Jane Austen, I've read Pride and Prejudice and I had the hardest time in high school getting into it. As adult, I thought it was my childish mind. LOL. No, I still feel the same. Too much dialogue without setting, characterization, and even internalization as well as visceral reaction from the MCs was so hard for me to grasp. It was boring. What if I wrote a novel involving pure dialogue and nothing else? It wouldn't sell. Guaranteed.

Another reason why publishers have a tight formula for us is because, well, thanks to the MOVIE INDUSTRY. Bleh! :p The plots don't plod like they used to anymore. They hurl the viewers into a constant state of action. Hardly any of it drags. Well, we need to keep up with society's adrenaline rushes of being entertained. Wouldn't you agree?

*Sigh* Great posting, girl. I'm right up there with ya, you know.

Boonsong said...

Well, I agree with you, but in a fairly disagreeable way. Is that OK?
Thanks for an interesting post.

All the best, Boonsong

cassandrajade said...

I think there are some really interesting books out there - just not on the best sellers lists recently. Some books that get released quietly are really unique and have interesting characters nad unexpected perspectives. It really is up to the readers out there to hunt out these gems and really promote them and maybe then more of them will get picked up.

Clarissa Draper said...

Modo, I think that's a good idea. I've read your book and I think there will be a lot of readers who find it interesting. How is your other book coming along? Scooter Girl - it's the one about the houses and the scooter.

elizabeth, I wrote a novel with all dialog. I had to publish it on my own because I knew publishers would not go for it but, I liked it.

Boonsong, thanks for disagreeing! :)

cassandrajade, yes, you're right. I was making a generalization. However, the majority of books written, and there are a lot, are expected to be of a certain caliber...(of the publisher's choosing.)

CD

Piedmont Writer said...

I finally made it over here and I'm glad I did. I agree with you. Everything the publishers want now is the same old, same old, they want what sells. With one book out to query and getting rejected, not for the writing but for the plot/formula, (it's not the same old) and also on the road to finishing the second book which is anything but same old, I'm afraid I'm never going to be pubbed.

But I always vowed to myself that I would never write for the market. In 5, 10 or even 20 years from now, my writing style will swing around again and I'll be in fashion once more.

Great post.

Googlover said...

LOL. Google is over, I should probably go by my real name or at least my nickname. Do you think the state of literature has to do with general trend of anti-intellectualism and dumbing down that is widespread in our culture?

Helen Ginger said...

It's been said that the way to get your foot in the publishing door is to write what the agents and editors want. They're the experts on what sells. Once you become a big name author, then you can branch out and do more of "your own thing."

There are some who ignore the rule and break out from the beginning, but they're few.

Helen

Talli Roland said...

Love the monkey!

I agree - there is a formula. I wonder if there was a formula a century ago, too, only it was different?

Clarissa Draper said...

Piedmont Writer, I agree with you, currently zombies are in but I have a feeling that will change. It will go away and something else will be popular. Keep writing.

Googlover, OH, you ask a really good question. I'm going to make it a question for my blog. Do you think the state of literature has to do with general trend of anti-intellectualism and dumbing down that is widespread in our culture? IMHO, yes.

Helen, yeah. And sadly, it's what I'm doing, but for those who would rather write from the heart...

Talli, what's with all these awesome questions. I'm going to make it a subject of a blog post coming up. Maybe tomorrow...


CD

Leigh Russell said...

This is a brilliant blog and such an interesting discussion. I write because I love writing - I'm completely hooked! I think my books are popular because I enjoy writing the kind of stories a lot of people like to read. If crime thrillers didn't sell well, I'd still write them, because now I've started, I just can't stop! I'd be happy to answer your questions, just email them over any time you like. I'm feeling quite upbeat about CUT SHORT having been shortlisted for a major award!

Leigh Russell said...

Meant to add... And I hope you enjoy reading it!

Clarissa Draper said...

Leigh, I love the book! I'm dealing with some family crisis's right now so I can't read it as fast as I would like but I know I'm going to pick up the next book as soon as it hits America.

I will email you.

CD

Popular Posts

Blog Archive